Choose a method
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Search
A single starting point to find the method, source or situation relevant to your question.
Find a method for your taskAll words must match, regardless of case or accents. Search stays in the selected language.
From two characters: use arrows to choose, Enter to open, Escape to close. You can also submit the full search.
Publication stating an award decision or procedure result. It does not, by itself, prove delivery or contract performance.
Part of a judgment or authority decision stating what was decided. Read it with the reasoning, procedure and facts.
Analysis presented to the Court of Justice of the European Union in some cases. It informs the debate but is not the judgment.
Identifier assigned to an archival unit so it can be retrieved. Record it with the institution, fonds and description.
Documents created or received by a person or organisation during its activity. Their origin helps interpret an individual item.
Inventory or guide describing holdings and call numbers. It points to documents but its summary does not replace reading an item.
Digital version of an identifiable edition. Separate the work’s date, the copy’s date and its online publication.
Intellectual property relating to a product’s appearance in a territory and protection state. Distinguish it from a trade mark or patent.
Authority where an intellectual property right is filed or registered. Aggregators may show several offices with different coverage.
Dated indication of a known challenge to a decision. A published decision may still change through the procedure.
Page, view, paragraph or exact passage supporting a claim in a document. It enables a check beyond a general link.
Person, establishment, transaction or area represented by one observation. Similarly named series may count different units.
Discontinuity caused by a changed definition, method, coverage or base year. An apparent trend may reflect that break.
Change to an already published figure after new information or methodological improvement. Keep each extraction date and version.
File, API or other concrete representation of a dataset. One catalogue entry may point to distributions with different formats or dates.
Digest calculated from a file to identify the exact version processed. A matching checksum does not establish data accuracy.
Extent to which producer, licence, resources and coverage are documented. It does not directly measure record accuracy.
The visual representing a page topic in its HTML content. It should agree with the title and context.
An image version suited to screen width or density. It avoids unnecessary transfer while preserving a fallback source.
Visible text placing an image in context, such as subject, date or source, without overclaiming.
Information embedded in some image files, such as description, creator or rights. It guarantees no search ranking.
Information about image owner, licence or rights-acquisition page; always check the original licence.
Stable URI joining nodes in a JSON-LD graph. Person, article and page should retain separate identities.
A page meeting supported types, properties and provider rules. Eligibility does not guarantee rich result display.
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Examine the origin, date, scope and limits of information.
Find definitions before applying a protocol.
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
A query produces several close results. Reading should help to distinguish the need definition folder, detailed method and implementation tool.
Updated on .
Formulate a specific need and then try neighboring terms. Read the descriptions and select the type of resource according to the searched step: understand, run or control.
The first result is not always the best document to the context. An absence can come from the vocabulary used rather than a lack of content.
A short route connects a need definition page, a guide and a checklist. Maintaining unresolved questions helps to rebuild research.
PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE
The following case illustrates an approach to defining the need. Situations are pedagogical: they serve to examine the choices and conditions of success, without describing a fulfilled mission or announcing a guaranteed result.
A reader is looking for how to check a number, while the resources use the word indicator. The results must allow to continue despite a different formulation of the title.
Try the neighboring terms and read the descriptions. Differentiate methods of calculation, comparison and verification of sources. Choose the resource that corresponds to the actually sought-by-step.
Research becomes a path of solution. The questions still open serve to clarify the next query instead of multiplying the words without clear intention.
Keep the starting question and then specify the object, operation and resource type. Useful results give a complementary vocabulary, but their title should not automatically replace the reader's target.
DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION
Describe the initial question and the desired result. Identify the object, operation and type of resource that could help: file, method or tool.
Try a formulation and read the descriptions. Release the useful terms and test the variants without giving up the intention. Compare the resources found according to their contribution to the route.
If the results are close but too general, specify the operation or scope. A well-classed page is not necessarily the one that meets the searched step.
Research is useful when it leads to a resource whose response can be identified. Open questions are used to prepare for the next consultation.
Keep a short track with request, resource and supplement. The reader can restart his work without repaired the tests that have led to useful content.
ANNOTATED WORKING DOCUMENT / REVIEW GRID
The note retains question, tried formulations, useful results and next resource. It distinguishes the exploration vocabulary from the initial goal of the reader.
On a small screen, scroll the grid horizontally to read all three columns.
| Observation | Supported interpretation | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| A resource responds to the desired operation. | The result can serve as a useful step in the course. | Keep the passage and choose the necessary supplement. |
| The results remain general despite the good topic. | The request must specify action, object or scope. | Try an appropriate formulation without losing the initial question. |
| The first result has the word but not the answer. | The presence of the term does not prove its relevance. | Read the descriptions and compare the contribution of resources. |
The final verification verifies that each step reduces an open question. A link list is not yet a useful path if the reader cannot explain what each page brings.
REPORTING / EXAMPLE WORDING
A search result must be judged according to its contribution to the searched operation.
Check that the track keeps the initial question despite the vocabulary variants.
The resource selected meets the described stage of the need. The questions still open guidelines the next consultation and remain distinct from the answer found.