Choose a method
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Search
A single starting point to find the method, source or situation relevant to your question.
Find a method for your taskAll words must match, regardless of case or accents. Search stays in the selected language.
From two characters: use arrows to choose, Enter to open, Escape to close. You can also submit the full search.
The statistical unit is the object observed; grain specifies what a row represents and its dimensions. Several rows can describe one unit.
A missing value lacks a usable observation; imputation assigns an estimate using a method. That estimate must remain identifiable.
A stock describes a position at a date; a flow describes events over a period. Adding successive stocks does not produce the period’s flow.
A percentage-point change subtracts two rates; relative change divides the difference by the initial rate. State the base and the result’s unit.
A civil date names a calendar day; a UTC timestamp identifies an instant. Converting a date without a time or zone would invent absent precision.
202 means processing was accepted but not completed; 206 means a response supplies requested partial content. Neither replaces checking the expected outcome.
A private cache serves one user; a shared cache can serve several users. Purging or bypassing them involves different operations.
Going from 0 to 12 adds 12 units. Relative change and the base-100 index remain undefined: division by a zero baseline cannot yield an interpretable percentage.
Going from 120 to 90 gives −30 units, or −25%. The final index is 75 with an initial base of 100; that is neither a 75% fall nor a loss of 25 units.
From 80 to 100, the increase is 25%. Returning from 100 to 80 is a 20% fall because the denominator becomes 100. The difference remains 20 units in absolute magnitude.
From 0.2% to 0.3%, the gap is 0.1 percentage point and the relative increase is 50%. This arithmetic proves neither causality nor significance; counts and the observation design are still needed.
Two disjoint, compatible groups have 9 cases out of 10 and 10 out of 1,000. Pooling gives 19 out of 1,010, approximately 1.88%. The simple average of 90% and 1%, which is 45.5%, does not describe this population.
The same 100 people are observed on two dates, with 10 and then 20 cases. Separate rates can be calculated, but pooling them as 200 distinct people would count individuals twice. Compatibility is therefore not confirmed here.
Retain successful access and exclusion from indexing as separate observations. Status 200 does not close this review. After changing the directive, inspect the final page and separately check any available indexing status.
Limit the conclusion to the 100 reviewed records; the other 200 remain unknown. Copies are not additional collection. Obtain the selection rule and a distinct observation covering unreviewed records.
Separate citation presence from support for the claim. Do not count this as a verified answer. Read the final destination, retain the passage and repeat the question under documented conditions.
The fictional crawler receives a disallow rule, but the resource responds without authentication. Do not treat the rules file as access protection. Test server-side protection with an unauthenticated client, then inspect the relevant crawler rules.
Retain this entry as an identified candidate in the case. Another result with the same name must not be merged without matching its attributes. Compare identifier, jurisdiction, relevant address and period before combining records.
The expected Spanish variant serves English and points to another language. Keep both defects separate rather than marking the translation checked. Check text, declared language and reciprocal links after correcting the Spanish version.
The fallback is not operational yet. Retain the critical dependency and restrict permissions to the authorised task. Run a limited test using replacement access; record elapsed time and unavailable functions.
Markup and the visible date of the same event disagree. Valid syntax does not validate the stated fact. Check the date against its source, then inspect visible content and final markup together.
No change does not mean the test passed: the attempted action exceeds the read-only mandate. Repeat after correcting boundaries; retain the proposal, rejected call and final state.
Mark the passage for review without guessing a replacement date. Retain previous wording and the review reason. Check the relevant notice, effective date and language versions before approving the correction.
The tested journey remains blocked for keyboard use even if other fields work. Locate the control and reproduction path. Repeat the whole journey with a keyboard after correction, including validation and error feedback.
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Examine the origin, date, scope and limits of information.
Find definitions before applying a protocol.
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
A query produces several close results. Reading should help to distinguish the need definition folder, detailed method and implementation tool.
Updated on .
Formulate a specific need and then try neighboring terms. Read the descriptions and select the type of resource according to the searched step: understand, run or control.
The first result is not always the best document to the context. An absence can come from the vocabulary used rather than a lack of content.
A short route connects a need definition page, a guide and a checklist. Maintaining unresolved questions helps to rebuild research.
PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE
The following case illustrates an approach to defining the need. Situations are pedagogical: they serve to examine the choices and conditions of success, without describing a fulfilled mission or announcing a guaranteed result.
A reader is looking for how to check a number, while the resources use the word indicator. The results must allow to continue despite a different formulation of the title.
Try the neighboring terms and read the descriptions. Differentiate methods of calculation, comparison and verification of sources. Choose the resource that corresponds to the actually sought-by-step.
Research becomes a path of solution. The questions still open serve to clarify the next query instead of multiplying the words without clear intention.
Keep the starting question and then specify the object, operation and resource type. Useful results give a complementary vocabulary, but their title should not automatically replace the reader's target.
DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION
Describe the initial question and the desired result. Identify the object, operation and type of resource that could help: file, method or tool.
Try a formulation and read the descriptions. Release the useful terms and test the variants without giving up the intention. Compare the resources found according to their contribution to the route.
If the results are close but too general, specify the operation or scope. A well-classed page is not necessarily the one that meets the searched step.
Research is useful when it leads to a resource whose response can be identified. Open questions are used to prepare for the next consultation.
Keep a short track with request, resource and supplement. The reader can restart his work without repaired the tests that have led to useful content.
ANNOTATED WORKING DOCUMENT / REVIEW GRID
The note retains question, tried formulations, useful results and next resource. It distinguishes the exploration vocabulary from the initial goal of the reader.
On a small screen, scroll the grid horizontally to read all three columns.
| Observation | Supported interpretation | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| A resource responds to the desired operation. | The result can serve as a useful step in the course. | Keep the passage and choose the necessary supplement. |
| The results remain general despite the good topic. | The request must specify action, object or scope. | Try an appropriate formulation without losing the initial question. |
| The first result has the word but not the answer. | The presence of the term does not prove its relevance. | Read the descriptions and compare the contribution of resources. |
The final verification verifies that each step reduces an open question. A link list is not yet a useful path if the reader cannot explain what each page brings.
REPORTING / EXAMPLE WORDING
A search result must be judged according to its contribution to the searched operation.
Check that the track keeps the initial question despite the vocabulary variants.
The resource selected meets the described stage of the need. The questions still open guidelines the next consultation and remain distinct from the answer found.