A focused research exercise
Observe a query with recorded settings, then examine a Lens or boosted domain’s effect. Retain useful URLs and distinguish this configuration effect from document quality.
Search engine
Kagi Search
Ad-free search with customizable results and a subscription-based offering.
Service publisher : Kagi
What the documentation explains
The documentation distinguishes search, Lenses, personalised results and assistant tools. A setting that boosts or hides a domain changes the observed view and belongs in the comparison protocol.
Kagi · Search help
Documentation consultation :
Readable reference
This consultation covers public documentation, not a service trial with an account. Features, modes and access conditions evolve; check those displayed when you conduct your research.
The decisive check
Test priority queries with the same personalization settings and record suppressed or boosted results.
Observe and distinguish the results
- Write the exact query and record language, region, filters, date and settings affecting results.
- Separate organic links, ads, maps and summaries. Open the final URL and identify its author, date and supporting data.
- Compare another discovery route, then return to the primary document. Absence from one query does not necessarily mean absence from the index.
What to retain
- Exact query or prompt; date, time and time zone.
- Service, mode, model or bot if indicated; language, region and settings.
- Final source URL; title, author, date and relevant passage.
- Claim checked; supporting evidence, contradiction or lack of evidence.
- Accessible scope and files; conditions needed to repeat the observation.
Method questions
Are two agreeing services two pieces of evidence?
Not when they trace back to the same document or reuse the same data. Count independent issuers and evidence, and retain the provenance chain.
Does a citation validate a fact?
The inspected passage must support the precise claim with the correct object, date and scope. A related page or topic mention is insufficient.
How can platforms be compared fairly?
Use the same question, recorded settings and several dated observations. Assess discovery, accuracy, provenance and usefulness separately; one example cannot rank a service.