Search the site’s resources

A single starting point to find the method, source or situation relevant to your question.

Find a method for your task

All words must match, regardless of case or accents. Search stays in the selected language.

From two characters: use arrows to choose, Enter to open, Escape to close. You can also submit the full search.

1682 results

Clear filters

Tool
Partial capture · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : The record separates the archived page, one missing image and a link opening the live web. The partial capture is explicit. Do not date current destination content to the archive date.
Tool
Documented relationship · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : Two entities share an address; the graph adds an ownership link without a supporting record. Remove the unsupported ownership claim and label the shared address. Find evidence specific to the relationship.
Tool
Identity before merging · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : Nodes A and B share a name; identifiers and periods are missing. Retain two provisional nodes and an unknown mapping. A missing link does not establish no relationship.
Tool
Path and direct link · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : The graph retains A → B in 2020 and B → C in 2024; no direct A → C link is asserted. Path and direct link are distinguished. Check period overlap before interpreting a simultaneous path.
Tool
Version and context · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : Reverse search finds a thumbnail; the original and first-publication caption remain unavailable. Keep the trace as a lead without certifying date or place. Seek a fuller version and earlier contexts.
Tool
Corroborated clues · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : The caption names location X; two visible features contradict the map used to support X. Retain the contradiction and suspend the proposed location. Do not discard conflicting clues to preserve the caption.
Tool
Provenance and truth · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : The record separates validated file provenance from an uncorroborated location caption. The separation is correct; location remains open. Provenance evidence does not close scene verification.
Tool
Decision and stage · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : The summary attributes a party’s quoted request to the judge; the operative part does not adopt it. Correct attribution and cite request, reasons and operative part separately in the identified document.
Tool
Retained scope · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : The initial decision is identified; existence and content of a later decision are unchecked. Date the search and limit the conclusion to the document read. Check relevant follow-up before claiming current status.
Tool
Proposal and decision · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : The file separates the public rapporteur’s proposal and the decision issued; each passage links to its record. Retain the distinction in the summary. Recheck attribution when translating or creating another excerpt.
Tool
Like-for-like comparison · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : Two values are joined by year: one counts people, the other thousands of people in another territory. Harmonize unit and territory, then check definition and population. Unit conversion alone does not fix scope.
Tool
Recoverable extraction · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : The calculation retains its result, but resource version, filters and transformations are undocumented. Reproducibility remains unverified. Locate the exact distribution and rebuild steps before reuse.
Tool
Record and observations · View a worked decision
Fictional observation : The catalog record was updated in 2024; the record retains 2021 observations and resource version V2. The three time dimensions are separated. Do not label the data as 2024 observations; recheck version after revision.
Guide
Two cited pages can serve eight questions
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · The panel has 20 questions and a corpus of 10 pages. Two distinct URLs appear across eight answers; other answers cite no page from this corpus.
Guide
A citation per answer does not verify every claim
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Four answers contain six checkable claims. Three answers cite a source; passage review supports four of six claims.
Guide
An overall rise can hide two declines
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Both panels contain 110 questions, but their mix of tasks A and B is reversed. The positive criterion is unchanged; each row retains its denominator.
Guide
Ten unreadable answers change the meaning of the rate
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Of 30 attempts in one programme, 20 answers are readable and 12 cite the target. The other 10 results remain unclassified.
Guide
One hundred and twenty answers are not one hundred and twenty questions
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Each of 40 questions is repeated three times. There are 36 cited answers and 20 questions cited at least once.
Guide
Distinguish tasks from attempts
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Ten tasks produce 14 attempts in total. Six tasks succeed immediately, two after retry; two remain unfinished.
Guide
An average does not cancel a stopping rule
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Before testing, the programme sets a limit of zero unauthorized actions. Of 50 tasks, 40 finish; one forbidden action occurs during a completed task.
Guide
Success and expected refusal may overlap
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Of 20 tasks, 18 finish. Four out-of-scope requests within these tasks are all refused. A task can therefore contribute to both rows.
Guide
A reference does not cover the whole proposition
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Each of four claims has a reference. Passage review supports three; the fourth passage describes another period.
Guide
Three sites can trace back to one declaration
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Nine publications appear across three sites. Provenance review finds one declaration repeated in all nine; no independent collection has been documented.
Guide
An access failure is not an empty result
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Twelve queries are documented. Seven return documents, three complete with no result and two time out. The binary criterion is at least one document for each query.

Choose a starting point

Choose a method

Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.

Check a source

Examine the origin, date, scope and limits of information.

Understand a term

Find definitions before applying a protocol.

How can I refine the search?

Start with the topic: Enter one or two specific terms: citation, CSV or provenance. Every word must be present, so a long sentence can exclude useful pages.
Broaden before filtering: Search all families first. Then select a guide, protocol or source according to the kind of answer you need.
Try different wording: Try a synonym or a term in the selected language. Quotes, OR and asterisks are not search operators.

DEEPER READING / PRACTICE

Turn internal search into a useful user journey

A query produces several close results. Reading should help to distinguish the need definition folder, detailed method and implementation tool.

Updated on 2026-10-21.

Priority checks

Formulate a specific need and then try neighboring terms. Read the descriptions and select the type of resource according to the searched step: understand, run or control.

Interpretation pitfalls

The first result is not always the best document to the context. An absence can come from the vocabulary used rather than a lack of content.

Working record to retain

A short route connects a need definition page, a guide and a checklist. Maintaining unresolved questions helps to rebuild research.

PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE

A natural requirement does not match the exact title

The following case illustrates an approach to defining the need. Situations are pedagogical: they serve to examine the choices and conditions of success, without describing a fulfilled mission or announcing a guaranteed result.

Example context

A reader is looking for how to check a number, while the resources use the word indicator. The results must allow to continue despite a different formulation of the title.

Suggested approach

Try the neighboring terms and read the descriptions. Differentiate methods of calculation, comparison and verification of sources. Choose the resource that corresponds to the actually sought-by-step.

Conclusion and next step

Research becomes a path of solution. The questions still open serve to clarify the next query instead of multiplying the words without clear intention.

Questions for deeper practice

How do you improve a search without losing the initial need?

Keep the starting question and then specify the object, operation and resource type. Useful results give a complementary vocabulary, but their title should not automatically replace the reader's target.

DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION

Refine a query for the task to carry out

01 / Prepare the necessary information
Describe the initial question and the desired result. Identify the object, operation and type of resource that could help: file, method or tool.
02 / Carry out the approach
Try a formulation and read the descriptions. Release the useful terms and test the variants without giving up the intention. Compare the resources found according to their contribution to the route.
03 / Examine an alternative situation
If the results are close but too general, specify the operation or scope. A well-classed page is not necessarily the one that meets the searched step.
04 / Decide on the next step
Research is useful when it leads to a resource whose response can be identified. Open questions are used to prepare for the next consultation.
05 / Hand over the verification records
Keep a short track with request, resource and supplement. The reader can restart his work without repaired the tests that have led to useful content.

ANNOTATED WORKING DOCUMENT / REVIEW GRID

A track record from a request

The note retains question, tried formulations, useful results and next resource. It distinguishes the exploration vocabulary from the initial goal of the reader.

On a small screen, scroll the grid horizontally to read all three columns.

Example situations to assess
Observation	Supported interpretation	Next step
A resource responds to the desired operation.	The result can serve as a useful step in the course.	Keep the passage and choose the necessary supplement.
The results remain general despite the good topic.	The request must specify action, object or scope.	Try an appropriate formulation without losing the initial question.
The first result has the word but not the answer.	The presence of the term does not prove its relevance.	Read the descriptions and compare the contribution of resources.

Reviewing the working document

The final verification verifies that each step reduces an open question. A link list is not yet a useful path if the reader cannot explain what each page brings.

REPORTING / EXAMPLE WORDING

Presentation of results: Turn internal search into a useful user journey

Point to clarify

A search result must be judged according to its contribution to the searched operation.

Before handing over

Check that the track keeps the initial question despite the vocabulary variants.

Example of a qualified conclusion

The resource selected meets the described stage of the need. The questions still open guidelines the next consultation and remain distinct from the answer found.