Choose a method
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Search
A single starting point to find the method, source or situation relevant to your question.
Find a method for your taskAll words must match, regardless of case or accents. Search stays in the selected language.
From two characters: use arrows to choose, Enter to open, Escape to close. You can also submit the full search.
The ILO’s 2019 guide explains four complementary measures. U is unemployment, LF the labour force, T time-related underemployment and F the potential labour force. T is already in employment; F is outside the labour force.
The acronym alone does not define a population. Metadata for the 2024 EU-LFS youth module, certified 5 December 2025, specify scope and differences from regular series. This describes that module, not a universal 15–34 youth definition.
Insee’s definition updated 7 April 2026 describes A–G. Historical A–E alone no longer describe the current classification: F and G were created in January 2025. These classify registered people, not the entire labour-force survey population.
This historical extract fixes 2024, both sexes and two age bands for the EU, Spain, France and Finland. The 40 lfsi_sla_a observations were updated 10 September 2026 and retrieved 22 October 2026. They are annual data, not the latest available quarter. Published values and flags are retained.
An ISBN identifies a publishing product: a particular title, edition and format, not every manifestation of a work. The local check follows International ISBN Agency arithmetic to detect transcription errors. It does not query allocation records or identify a book.
An ISSN identifies a continuing resource, not every article or issue. ISSN centres and national libraries distinguish medium versions. Before joining catalogues record the actual identifier type and catalogue links.
A direct entity-to-value link does not carry all statement context. Wikibase RDF separates subject, statement node, qualifiers and references. This matters for dated roles, measurement methods and multiple values. Prefixes express graph roles, not trust levels.
Truthy is a technical projection. For one entity-property pair, preferred statements exclude normal ones from that projection; otherwise normal statements are selected. This is neither automatic source voting nor latest-date selection.
Europeana separates the described cultural heritage object from its web representations. This prevents treating a catalogue page as an image file or one representation’s rights as universal. Class and property names follow EDM documentation checked 22 October 2026.
ORCID helps distinguish namesakes, but a record combines assertions from different origins. ORCID separates who adds an item from who connects it to the person. Holder-controlled visibility also limits what a public reader can observe.
RFC 9457, published July 2023, replaces RFC 7807. Its response body adds context without replacing HTTP status. These members are possible, not universally mandatory; incorrectly typed members are ignored under the specification.
Separate call duration from requested retry delay. RFCs 6585 and 9110 define status and Retry-After, not one quota for every service. Numeric examples below are HTTP documentation examples, not observations of a queried site.
Official documentation updated 14 October 2026 and checked 22 October specifies current limits. These rules apply to OpenAlex, not automatically Crossref or harvesting protocols. Preserve documentation vintage with extraction.
Crossref works paging follows service rules checked 22 October 2026. Documentation uses actual returned item counts for stopping. Do not copy OpenAlex termination: field names and contracts differ.
OAI-PMH 2.0 distinguishes items, metadata formats and disseminated records. Document version 8 January 2015 defines date selection and partial-list resumption. Diagram counts are protocol examples, not measured HAL or OpenAIRE totals.
RFC 6901 addresses a value inside JSON. It is neither JSONPath nor a modification operation. The reader uses a small invented teaching document, not real observations, distinguishing resolved value, missing path and invalid syntax.
COMPARE-7_1_6.DAT contains the NIST outlier demonstration’s 90 values. Ordered data were checked 22 October 2026. This is a documented teaching dataset, not an income survey or site performance measurement.
R documents nine sample-quantile algorithms, with type 7 as default. The NIST 90-value example interpolates at (n + 1)p. Identical files can therefore produce different quartiles without transcription errors.
State whether weights represent frequency, population or another convention. A formula alone does not make data representative. R weighted.mean() documentation clarifies missing-value behavior for that function, not every library.
Spread describes observations; estimator uncertainty describes sampling variability within a model. Sharing units does not make them interchangeable. R documents its SD denominator; NIST explains assumptions for mean intervals.
Insee’s 18 November 2025 publication reports these 2023 values for mainland France, ordinary housing, non-negative declared household income and a non-student reference person. Annual levels are in 2023 euros. This is a fixed publication snapshot.
Insee and Eurostat describe the modified OECD scale for differing household composition. It divides disposable income by an equivalent size, accounting for conventional scale economies. This differs from survey weighting and per-person division.
France’s 1 January 2026 COG has several entity types. Insee allows a commune and delegated commune to share a code. Twenty official CSV records checked 22 October 2026 illustrate joins, not an exhaustive directory or population series.
The event file describes changes since 1943 and may use several rows for one transformation. A row is a before-after relationship, not necessarily an independent event. Historical examples in the 2026 documentation demonstrate lost information in one-to-one matching.
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Examine the origin, date, scope and limits of information.
Find definitions before applying a protocol.
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
A query produces several close results. Reading should help to distinguish the need definition folder, detailed method and implementation tool.
Updated on .
Formulate a specific need and then try neighboring terms. Read the descriptions and select the type of resource according to the searched step: understand, run or control.
The first result is not always the best document to the context. An absence can come from the vocabulary used rather than a lack of content.
A short route connects a need definition page, a guide and a checklist. Maintaining unresolved questions helps to rebuild research.
PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE
The following case illustrates an approach to defining the need. Situations are pedagogical: they serve to examine the choices and conditions of success, without describing a fulfilled mission or announcing a guaranteed result.
A reader is looking for how to check a number, while the resources use the word indicator. The results must allow to continue despite a different formulation of the title.
Try the neighboring terms and read the descriptions. Differentiate methods of calculation, comparison and verification of sources. Choose the resource that corresponds to the actually sought-by-step.
Research becomes a path of solution. The questions still open serve to clarify the next query instead of multiplying the words without clear intention.
Keep the starting question and then specify the object, operation and resource type. Useful results give a complementary vocabulary, but their title should not automatically replace the reader's target.
DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION
Describe the initial question and the desired result. Identify the object, operation and type of resource that could help: file, method or tool.
Try a formulation and read the descriptions. Release the useful terms and test the variants without giving up the intention. Compare the resources found according to their contribution to the route.
If the results are close but too general, specify the operation or scope. A well-classed page is not necessarily the one that meets the searched step.
Research is useful when it leads to a resource whose response can be identified. Open questions are used to prepare for the next consultation.
Keep a short track with request, resource and supplement. The reader can restart his work without repaired the tests that have led to useful content.
ANNOTATED WORKING DOCUMENT / REVIEW GRID
The note retains question, tried formulations, useful results and next resource. It distinguishes the exploration vocabulary from the initial goal of the reader.
On a small screen, scroll the grid horizontally to read all three columns.
| Observation | Supported interpretation | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| A resource responds to the desired operation. | The result can serve as a useful step in the course. | Keep the passage and choose the necessary supplement. |
| The results remain general despite the good topic. | The request must specify action, object or scope. | Try an appropriate formulation without losing the initial question. |
| The first result has the word but not the answer. | The presence of the term does not prove its relevance. | Read the descriptions and compare the contribution of resources. |
The final verification verifies that each step reduces an open question. A link list is not yet a useful path if the reader cannot explain what each page brings.
REPORTING / EXAMPLE WORDING
A search result must be judged according to its contribution to the searched operation.
Check that the track keeps the initial question despite the vocabulary variants.
The resource selected meets the described stage of the need. The questions still open guidelines the next consultation and remain distinct from the answer found.