Choose a method
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Search
A single starting point to find the method, source or situation relevant to your question.
Find a method for your taskAll words must match, regardless of case or accents. Search stays in the selected language.
From two characters: use arrows to choose, Enter to open, Escape to close. You can also submit the full search.
Find deposited datasets, software, publications and other research objects with metadata and identifiers.
Explore research outputs and relationships to data, software, projects, people and organisations.
Compare the uses, identifiers, evidence fields and limits of two to four public sources, without an artificial ranking.
Four explained calculators: changes, percentage points, weighted rates and descriptive bounds for missing results.
Find a figure, understand its scope and cite the right passage: a method for reading reports, annexes and tables while retaining their qualifications.
Map destinations by language, preserve journeys and test routes: prepare URL changes without losing useful content.
Move from a scanned page to verified information: check characters, tables, reading order and languages before searching, calculating or citing automatically recognized text.
Count original records rather than links: identify republication, shared data and distinct observations before drawing a conclusion.
Before citing a study, identify its editorial status, update notice and the passage affected by a correction or retraction.
Matching names, sizes or appearances do not establish identical versions. A SHA-256 digest represents file bytes. It helps detect changes without establishing authorship, creation date or truth of the contents.
Separate work, author, organisation, repository, journal and trial to cite the right object and version.
Separate calendar dates, local times and instants before sorting records or converting to UTC.
Select two to four engines or assistants to compare their objects, documentary context and useful checks.
Find civil-time rules, UTC offsets and daylight-saving changes in an identified tz database release.
Identify UN statistical countries or areas and groupings using their M49 codes.
Separate format, check digit, assignment and matching when linking authors, publications and versions.
Link important claims to source passages and check numbers, versions, omissions and uncertainty.
Separate technical success, received content, redirects, restrictions and transport errors.
Define population, selection, repetitions and exclusions so test results can be interpreted.
Find the work by title and DOI in OpenAlex, compare the Crossref deposit, then open the publication at its publisher or repository.
Start from DOI or title, compare records, open the manuscript or publication and record its version.
Compare ORCID identifiers, attributed works and affiliations; use ROR to identify organisations.
Follow related identifiers, identify the repository and retain the exact dataset version, licence and analysed files.
Identify the relevant registration, record its date and compare objectives, criteria and population with the results document.
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Examine the origin, date, scope and limits of information.
Find definitions before applying a protocol.
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
A query produces several close results. Reading should help to distinguish the need definition folder, detailed method and implementation tool.
Updated on .
Formulate a specific need and then try neighboring terms. Read the descriptions and select the type of resource according to the searched step: understand, run or control.
The first result is not always the best document to the context. An absence can come from the vocabulary used rather than a lack of content.
A short route connects a need definition page, a guide and a checklist. Maintaining unresolved questions helps to rebuild research.
PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE
The following case illustrates an approach to defining the need. Situations are pedagogical: they serve to examine the choices and conditions of success, without describing a fulfilled mission or announcing a guaranteed result.
A reader is looking for how to check a number, while the resources use the word indicator. The results must allow to continue despite a different formulation of the title.
Try the neighboring terms and read the descriptions. Differentiate methods of calculation, comparison and verification of sources. Choose the resource that corresponds to the actually sought-by-step.
Research becomes a path of solution. The questions still open serve to clarify the next query instead of multiplying the words without clear intention.
Keep the starting question and then specify the object, operation and resource type. Useful results give a complementary vocabulary, but their title should not automatically replace the reader's target.
DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION
Describe the initial question and the desired result. Identify the object, operation and type of resource that could help: file, method or tool.
Try a formulation and read the descriptions. Release the useful terms and test the variants without giving up the intention. Compare the resources found according to their contribution to the route.
If the results are close but too general, specify the operation or scope. A well-classed page is not necessarily the one that meets the searched step.
Research is useful when it leads to a resource whose response can be identified. Open questions are used to prepare for the next consultation.
Keep a short track with request, resource and supplement. The reader can restart his work without repaired the tests that have led to useful content.
ANNOTATED WORKING DOCUMENT / REVIEW GRID
The note retains question, tried formulations, useful results and next resource. It distinguishes the exploration vocabulary from the initial goal of the reader.
On a small screen, scroll the grid horizontally to read all three columns.
| Observation | Supported interpretation | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| A resource responds to the desired operation. | The result can serve as a useful step in the course. | Keep the passage and choose the necessary supplement. |
| The results remain general despite the good topic. | The request must specify action, object or scope. | Try an appropriate formulation without losing the initial question. |
| The first result has the word but not the answer. | The presence of the term does not prove its relevance. | Read the descriptions and compare the contribution of resources. |
The final verification verifies that each step reduces an open question. A link list is not yet a useful path if the reader cannot explain what each page brings.
REPORTING / EXAMPLE WORDING
A search result must be judged according to its contribution to the searched operation.
Check that the track keeps the initial question despite the vocabulary variants.
The resource selected meets the described stage of the need. The questions still open guidelines the next consultation and remain distinct from the answer found.