Search

Search the site’s resources

A single starting point to find the method, source or situation relevant to your question.

Find a method for your task

All words must match, regardless of case or accents. Search stays in the selected language.

From two characters: use arrows to choose, Enter to open, Escape to close. You can also submit the full search.

1682 results

Clear filters
  1. Guide

    Repeated keys: predict row counts before joining

    An identifier appearing in both tables does not guarantee a one-to-one relationship. Each key’s frequencies determine the number of pairs. The teaching example uses two-string composite keys; FR and FI are markers only, not references to real records.

  2. Guide

    Excluding rows: NOT IN and NOT EXISTS can differ

    Finding keys absent from a second table requires a policy for missing values. A NULL in a subquery result can make NOT IN unknown. These expressions concern one column; the reader also distinguishes an equality that explicitly treats NULL values as comparable.

  3. Guide

    Timestamps: check the calendar before comparing strings

    Different spellings can represent the same instant. Conversely, alphabetical order can contradict time order when offsets or fractions differ. The comparator retains the input text and calculates within an explicit profile without asking the browser to infer a time zone.

  4. Guide

    Time windows: state the bounds to prevent double counting

    The [start, end) convention includes the start and excludes the end. Two windows can meet without assigning their shared boundary instant to both. An extraction must state this choice; it does not automatically make an API’s filters exclusive.

  5. Guide

    Connectivity: distinguish people, fixed subscriptions and mobile lines

    The extract covers 2021–2023 for France, Finland, Brazil and India. It contains 36 telecommunications observations and 12 reference populations. These four countries illustrate definitions and methods without forming a ranking or a representative global sample.

  6. Guide

    Choose a digital measure for the question being asked

    Similar names do not make indicators interchangeable. The selector compares six questions with the extract’s three telecommunications series. It also identifies questions none of them answers, to avoid turning subscriptions into a measure of equipment or behaviour.

  7. Guide

    Four countries: see what population weighting changes

    For the four selected countries in 2023, the simple mean of Internet-use shares is 81.188278%. The scenario using WDI populations as weights gives 64.343169%. Both are calculated here from published values, not copied from an official ITU or World Bank aggregate.

  8. Guide

    Top results: separate precision, recall and first success

    Two rankings may retrieve the same number of relevant documents while placing them at very different positions. This exercise separates quality within the first k results, coverage of the collection and the wait for the first useful result.

  9. Guide

    NDCG: state the gain and build the right ideal ranking

    Grades 1, 2 and 3 do not yet specify how relevance is valued. Compare linear and exponential gains on the same documents; the ideal ranking must come from the full collection at the same k.

  10. Guide

    Incomplete judgments: preserve unknowns and scope

    Relevance is assessed for a particular information need. A partially judged collection does not make unjudged documents useless. This separate example distinguishes judgment coverage, observed precision and possible bounds.

  11. Guide

    Repeated quotation: locate the passage with context

    Identical quotations can occur more than once. Web Annotation distinguishes the selected text from its immediate prefix and suffix. Context can resolve ambiguity; it proves neither authorship nor factual accuracy.

  12. Guide

    Quotation positions: count code points, not JavaScript units

    Start and end offsets are reproducible only when the text and counting unit stay the same. TextPositionSelector counts Unicode code points in logical order, including for right-to-left text.

  13. Guide

    Citing a passage: separate selection from source state

    A text selector answers “which passage?”; a state answers “which representation?”. Keeping both helps an evidence record or AI-summary check avoid attributing a quotation to the wrong version.

  14. Guide

    Observed proportion: report counts and a Wilson interval

    Five positive cases out of twenty give 25%, as do 250 out of 1,000. Under a suitable binomial model, the estimates do not have equal precision. This explorer separates the observed rate, confidence level and calculated limits.

  15. Guide

    Compare systems on the same cases: retain the pairs

    Two overall rates do not reveal which cases changed. A paired table classifies each case once using decisions from A and B under the same binary criterion. The exact McNemar test uses discordant pairs.

  16. Guide

    OCR: measure errors against an explicit reference and profile

    Levenshtein distance counts the minimum operations needed to turn a reference into candidate text. It can examine a transcription or excerpt, but does not assess translation faithfulness or answer truth.

  17. Guide

    Several OCR documents: sum errors and reference lengths

    Mean document rates and a corpus rate answer different questions. This reader exposes denominators, including a reference verified to be empty.

  18. Guide

    HTTP byte ranges: inclusive endpoints and selected length

    Resuming a transfer requires precise byte positions. HTTP byte offsets start at zero and both endpoints are inclusive. The calculation separates range validity, satisfiability for a known length and the server’s actual response.

  19. Guide

    Combining fragments: coverage, gaps and representation identity

    Adding received lengths can conceal an incomplete transfer: overlap counts the same positions repeatedly. Compute the union of the intervals and compare it with the intended representation. This geometric check remains separate from byte identity and provenance.

  20. Guide

    JSON Merge Patch: delete, retain or replace a value

    A partial update must identify its format. JSON Merge Patch describes values to merge into a target; JSON Patch describes operations. Their media types and treatment of null differ. The simulator lets you inspect a merge without calling an API.

  21. Guide

    JSON Patch: follow operations on the current document

    A JSON Patch list is evaluated in order. Each path addresses the document produced by previous operations, not a permanent snapshot of the initial document. These nine original walkthroughs show calculation states and stopping conditions.

  22. Guide

    SemVer: compare precedence without inventing identity

    SemVer 2.0.0 defines syntax and precedence for software versions with a declared public API. Treating them as plain strings or decimal numbers gives incorrect results. A dataset date or tag name does not automatically adopt this contract.

  23. Guide

    SemVer: connect a version increment to a declared change

    A version number cannot reveal a change’s impact by itself. For a public API already using SemVer with a positive major version, the team must first classify the change. The calculator then illustrates the corresponding increment; it performs no compatibility audit.

  24. Public source

    BnF: separate the reading room, catalogue and digital copy

    Beneath the Oval Room’s glass roof, reading tables and shelves give documentary research a physical setting. This photograph locates BnF Richelieu in Paris; it shows neither a Gallica page nor a book’s online availability. Finding a source requires moving from the place to the record and then to the exact document.

Choose a starting point

Check a source

Examine the origin, date, scope and limits of information.

How can I refine the search?
Start with the topic
Enter one or two specific terms: citation, CSV or provenance. Every word must be present, so a long sentence can exclude useful pages.
Broaden before filtering
Search all families first. Then select a guide, protocol or source according to the kind of answer you need.
Try different wording
Try a synonym or a term in the selected language. Quotes, OR and asterisks are not search operators.

DEEPER READING / PRACTICE

Turn internal search into a useful user journey

A query produces several close results. Reading should help to distinguish the need definition folder, detailed method and implementation tool.

Updated on .

Priority checks

Formulate a specific need and then try neighboring terms. Read the descriptions and select the type of resource according to the searched step: understand, run or control.

Interpretation pitfalls

The first result is not always the best document to the context. An absence can come from the vocabulary used rather than a lack of content.

Working record to retain

A short route connects a need definition page, a guide and a checklist. Maintaining unresolved questions helps to rebuild research.

PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE

A natural requirement does not match the exact title

The following case illustrates an approach to defining the need. Situations are pedagogical: they serve to examine the choices and conditions of success, without describing a fulfilled mission or announcing a guaranteed result.

Example context

A reader is looking for how to check a number, while the resources use the word indicator. The results must allow to continue despite a different formulation of the title.

Suggested approach

Try the neighboring terms and read the descriptions. Differentiate methods of calculation, comparison and verification of sources. Choose the resource that corresponds to the actually sought-by-step.

Conclusion and next step

Research becomes a path of solution. The questions still open serve to clarify the next query instead of multiplying the words without clear intention.

Questions for deeper practice

How do you improve a search without losing the initial need?

Keep the starting question and then specify the object, operation and resource type. Useful results give a complementary vocabulary, but their title should not automatically replace the reader's target.

DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION

Refine a query for the task to carry out

  1. 01 / Prepare the necessary information

    Describe the initial question and the desired result. Identify the object, operation and type of resource that could help: file, method or tool.

  2. 02 / Carry out the approach

    Try a formulation and read the descriptions. Release the useful terms and test the variants without giving up the intention. Compare the resources found according to their contribution to the route.

  3. 03 / Examine an alternative situation

    If the results are close but too general, specify the operation or scope. A well-classed page is not necessarily the one that meets the searched step.

  4. 04 / Decide on the next step

    Research is useful when it leads to a resource whose response can be identified. Open questions are used to prepare for the next consultation.

  5. 05 / Hand over the verification records

    Keep a short track with request, resource and supplement. The reader can restart his work without repaired the tests that have led to useful content.

ANNOTATED WORKING DOCUMENT / REVIEW GRID

A track record from a request

The note retains question, tried formulations, useful results and next resource. It distinguishes the exploration vocabulary from the initial goal of the reader.

On a small screen, scroll the grid horizontally to read all three columns.

Example situations to assess
ObservationSupported interpretationNext step
A resource responds to the desired operation.The result can serve as a useful step in the course.Keep the passage and choose the necessary supplement.
The results remain general despite the good topic.The request must specify action, object or scope.Try an appropriate formulation without losing the initial question.
The first result has the word but not the answer.The presence of the term does not prove its relevance.Read the descriptions and compare the contribution of resources.

Reviewing the working document

The final verification verifies that each step reduces an open question. A link list is not yet a useful path if the reader cannot explain what each page brings.

REPORTING / EXAMPLE WORDING

Presentation of results: Turn internal search into a useful user journey

Point to clarify

A search result must be judged according to its contribution to the searched operation.

Before handing over

Check that the track keeps the initial question despite the vocabulary variants.

Example of a qualified conclusion

The resource selected meets the described stage of the need. The questions still open guidelines the next consultation and remain distinct from the answer found.