Choose a method
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Search
A single starting point to find the method, source or situation relevant to your question.
Find a method for your taskAll words must match, regardless of case or accents. Search stays in the selected language.
From two characters: use arrows to choose, Enter to open, Escape to close. You can also submit the full search.
The chain linking a claim to its source, date and transformations.
Evidence doctrine, source qualification, confidence levels and explicit correction by Alexis Roux ZG.
DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION
The chain used to recover a content item’s origin, transformations and rights.
Assertions linked to a file and its history; technical validation does not prove a caption is true.
Provenance traces where a claim came from and how it changed. Authority expresses how much confidence a source deserves for a particular question. An identifiable origin helps assessment but does not itself make a source reliable.
Fictional observation : The record separates validated file provenance from an uncorroborated location caption. The separation is correct; location remains open. Provenance evidence does not close scene verification.
C2PA 2.4 defines signed manifests associated with digital content. It separates structural and binding validation from judging assertions. A validation indicator does not replace editorial image examination.
W3C PROV-O describes how documents or data were produced. Arrows follow property direction, not a left-to-right timeline. E0, A and E1 are teaching labels, not real resources.
A method to review purpose, provenance, rights, alt text, context, formats and discoverability of editorial images.
What to prepare : Authorised documents, owners, dates, versions and corpus access rules. Delivery to agree : Document organisation, claim provenance and update rules.
Is provenance evidence distinguished from the truth of a caption? Its absence alone is also insufficient to declare an image false.
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Nine publications appear across three sites. Provenance review finds one declaration repeated in all nine; no independent collection has been documented.
This reproduction shows an opening of the Library of Congress Gutenberg Bible, with provenance marks on the inside cover. It comes from WDL7782 as relayed by Wikimedia Commons. Describe the work and this copy’s history separately.
Adding received lengths can conceal an incomplete transfer: overlap counts the same positions repeatedly. Compute the union of the intervals and compare it with the intended representation. This geometric check remains separate from byte identity and provenance.
Alexis Roux ZG dossier centre: AI, OSINT, SEO, SXO, GEO, LLMO, editorial architecture, reputation, sovereignty, monitoring and mission direction.
Practical guides to SEO, GEO, AI citations, structured data, agent evaluation and editorial maintenance.
Operational definitions for clear discussion of AI, OSINT, search, visibility, evidence and sovereignty.
Directory of major AI assistants, search engines and SEO, SXO, AEO, GEO and LLMO disciplines.
OSINT, monitoring, ecosystem mapping and digital due diligence by Alexis Roux ZG.
SEO, SXO, AEO, GEO, LLMO and digital authority by Alexis Roux ZG.
Sovereign architecture, dependencies, resilience and information governance by Alexis Roux ZG.
Alexis Roux ZG notes on AI, search, OSINT, reputation and digital sovereignty.
Digital reputation diagnosis, semantic footprint and response scenarios by Alexis Roux ZG.
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Examine the origin, date, scope and limits of information.
Find definitions before applying a protocol.
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
A query produces several close results. Reading should help to distinguish the need definition folder, detailed method and implementation tool.
Updated on .
Formulate a specific need and then try neighboring terms. Read the descriptions and select the type of resource according to the searched step: understand, run or control.
The first result is not always the best document to the context. An absence can come from the vocabulary used rather than a lack of content.
A short route connects a need definition page, a guide and a checklist. Maintaining unresolved questions helps to rebuild research.
PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE
The following case illustrates an approach to defining the need. Situations are pedagogical: they serve to examine the choices and conditions of success, without describing a fulfilled mission or announcing a guaranteed result.
A reader is looking for how to check a number, while the resources use the word indicator. The results must allow to continue despite a different formulation of the title.
Try the neighboring terms and read the descriptions. Differentiate methods of calculation, comparison and verification of sources. Choose the resource that corresponds to the actually sought-by-step.
Research becomes a path of solution. The questions still open serve to clarify the next query instead of multiplying the words without clear intention.
Keep the starting question and then specify the object, operation and resource type. Useful results give a complementary vocabulary, but their title should not automatically replace the reader's target.
DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION
Describe the initial question and the desired result. Identify the object, operation and type of resource that could help: file, method or tool.
Try a formulation and read the descriptions. Release the useful terms and test the variants without giving up the intention. Compare the resources found according to their contribution to the route.
If the results are close but too general, specify the operation or scope. A well-classed page is not necessarily the one that meets the searched step.
Research is useful when it leads to a resource whose response can be identified. Open questions are used to prepare for the next consultation.
Keep a short track with request, resource and supplement. The reader can restart his work without repaired the tests that have led to useful content.
ANNOTATED WORKING DOCUMENT / REVIEW GRID
The note retains question, tried formulations, useful results and next resource. It distinguishes the exploration vocabulary from the initial goal of the reader.
On a small screen, scroll the grid horizontally to read all three columns.
| Observation | Supported interpretation | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| A resource responds to the desired operation. | The result can serve as a useful step in the course. | Keep the passage and choose the necessary supplement. |
| The results remain general despite the good topic. | The request must specify action, object or scope. | Try an appropriate formulation without losing the initial question. |
| The first result has the word but not the answer. | The presence of the term does not prove its relevance. | Read the descriptions and compare the contribution of resources. |
The final verification verifies that each step reduces an open question. A link list is not yet a useful path if the reader cannot explain what each page brings.
REPORTING / EXAMPLE WORDING
A search result must be judged according to its contribution to the searched operation.
Check that the track keeps the initial question despite the vocabulary variants.
The resource selected meets the described stage of the need. The questions still open guidelines the next consultation and remain distinct from the answer found.