Choose a method
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Search
A single starting point to find the method, source or situation relevant to your question.
Find a method for your taskAll words must match, regardless of case or accents. Search stays in the selected language.
From two characters: use arrows to choose, Enter to open, Escape to close. You can also submit the full search.
Compare title, ISSN, publisher and official domain; locate the article through DOI or PMID where available.
Return from ICTRP to the original registry, keep secondary IDs and search for an article by trial ID.
Break down the disagreement, compare dates and scope, and keep uncertainty visible in the conclusion.
24 paths for checking sources, comparing data, publishing a site or evaluating AI, with steps, checks and limitations.
€80 excl. VAT / €96 incl. VAT per hour: webmaster, development, SEO, SXO, GEO, design, OSINT and AI services, packages and maintenance.
Several articles appear to confirm an announcement, but each traces back to one initial post with an unidentified source.
PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
What to prepare : Names and variants, official identifiers, reference pages and conflicting information. Delivery to agree : Sourced entity record, distinguished variants and public corrections awaiting approval.
What to prepare : Real questions, expected answer, available evidence and qualifications to retain. Delivery to agree : Pages answering questions directly, with visible references and limits.
What to prepare : Authorised documents, owners, dates, versions and corpus access rules. Delivery to agree : Document organisation, claim provenance and update rules.
Separate technical access, answer quality and observed visibility. A valid sitemap or markup does not guarantee appearance. A diagnosis separating fixable defects, editorial hypotheses and observed visibility.
Compare bounded observations without turning a one-off trial into a universal ranking. A dated comparison limited to the questions and recorded conditions.
Which version can support a reference to page 24? A 2023 manuscript and a 2024 edition share a title. The cited page exists only in the 2024 edition.
Fictional example · no measurement of this site or a client · Of 30 attempts in one programme, 20 answers are readable and 12 cite the target. The other 10 results remain unclassified.
The Gallica address ark:/12148/bpt6k83037p/f143 has distinct components. ARK is a persistent identifier system. The domain provides access while the assigning authority and assigned name identify an object within its namespace.
This reproduction shows an opening of the Library of Congress Gutenberg Bible, with provenance marks on the inside cover. It comes from WDL7782 as relayed by Wikimedia Commons. Describe the work and this copy’s history separately.
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Examine the origin, date, scope and limits of information.
Find definitions before applying a protocol.
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
A query produces several close results. Reading should help to distinguish the need definition folder, detailed method and implementation tool.
Updated on .
Formulate a specific need and then try neighboring terms. Read the descriptions and select the type of resource according to the searched step: understand, run or control.
The first result is not always the best document to the context. An absence can come from the vocabulary used rather than a lack of content.
A short route connects a need definition page, a guide and a checklist. Maintaining unresolved questions helps to rebuild research.
PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE
The following case illustrates an approach to defining the need. Situations are pedagogical: they serve to examine the choices and conditions of success, without describing a fulfilled mission or announcing a guaranteed result.
A reader is looking for how to check a number, while the resources use the word indicator. The results must allow to continue despite a different formulation of the title.
Try the neighboring terms and read the descriptions. Differentiate methods of calculation, comparison and verification of sources. Choose the resource that corresponds to the actually sought-by-step.
Research becomes a path of solution. The questions still open serve to clarify the next query instead of multiplying the words without clear intention.
Keep the starting question and then specify the object, operation and resource type. Useful results give a complementary vocabulary, but their title should not automatically replace the reader's target.
DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION
Describe the initial question and the desired result. Identify the object, operation and type of resource that could help: file, method or tool.
Try a formulation and read the descriptions. Release the useful terms and test the variants without giving up the intention. Compare the resources found according to their contribution to the route.
If the results are close but too general, specify the operation or scope. A well-classed page is not necessarily the one that meets the searched step.
Research is useful when it leads to a resource whose response can be identified. Open questions are used to prepare for the next consultation.
Keep a short track with request, resource and supplement. The reader can restart his work without repaired the tests that have led to useful content.
ANNOTATED WORKING DOCUMENT / REVIEW GRID
The note retains question, tried formulations, useful results and next resource. It distinguishes the exploration vocabulary from the initial goal of the reader.
On a small screen, scroll the grid horizontally to read all three columns.
| Observation | Supported interpretation | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| A resource responds to the desired operation. | The result can serve as a useful step in the course. | Keep the passage and choose the necessary supplement. |
| The results remain general despite the good topic. | The request must specify action, object or scope. | Try an appropriate formulation without losing the initial question. |
| The first result has the word but not the answer. | The presence of the term does not prove its relevance. | Read the descriptions and compare the contribution of resources. |
The final verification verifies that each step reduces an open question. A link list is not yet a useful path if the reader cannot explain what each page brings.
REPORTING / EXAMPLE WORDING
A search result must be judged according to its contribution to the searched operation.
Check that the track keeps the initial question despite the vocabulary variants.
The resource selected meets the described stage of the need. The questions still open guidelines the next consultation and remain distinct from the answer found.