Before adding a photograph, state what it helps readers understand. A decorative image needs different treatment from a document, portrait or diagram. Caption, credit, context and text alternative should serve that role.
An image needs a role, a source and a useful format
Decide what the reader must understand first. An atmosphere image may introduce a topic; an image used as evidence needs an origin and context. Decide cropping, caption and file weight afterwards.
Which check comes first?
Choose the situation you observed. Each path gives a first check, useful evidence and the limit of that check.
A photograph has no identifiable source
First check
Find the first traceable record and compare image, caption, date and credit. Separate the image producer from accounts republishing it.
Evidence to retain
Exact URL, document identifier, credit, known capture and publication dates, and the passage establishing context.
Limit to remember
Recognising an image does not confirm an event claimed by a new caption. An unsuccessful search does not prove fabrication.
Compare the full image with the crop actually shown on mobile and desktop. Check faces, captions, scales, landmarks and details needed for understanding.
Evidence to retain
Original image, crop, displayed dimensions, positioning rule and an example of the lost detail.
Limit to remember
An attractive crop can change meaning. Alternative text helps according to the image’s role but cannot alone make an unreadable chart usable.
Identify the file actually loaded, its size and discovery in the network timeline. Compare its width with the display and check whether it carries the main content.
Evidence to retain
Image URL, received variant, dimensions, transferred bytes, device, network and repeated measurements before and after the fix.
Limit to remember
Smaller files do not resolve late discovery. An undersized variant can harm readability; do not choose compression by byte count alone.
An authentic photo can be used outside its time context
Apollo 17’s Earth photo offers a concrete case: identifying a photograph does not date the story attached to it. The date of a page republishing it and the capture date are separate facts.
Real photograph · NASA / Apollo 17 crew
Capture date
Document identifier
AS17-148-22727
Check before citing
Find AS17-148-22727 in the record, then compare the image and caption.
Keep capture, publication and consultation dates separate. Recent republication does not make a photo recent.
For a Worldview layer, also record sensor, date and processing: this historical photograph is not a Worldview screenshot.
Real documentary case, consulted on 2026-10-14. Resized and encoded WebP version, with no crop or AI retouching.
It can carry useful provenance and rights details but guarantees no ranking. Visible content, context and accessibility matter.
Should one image be reused everywhere?
Repetition can identify a subject, but distinct page images often make editorial intent clearer.
Should text be embedded in images?
Use HTML text when it must be read, translated or resized. Provide an accessible equivalent if embedded text is necessary.
How can an image variant be checked against its display?
Compare displayed dimensions, pixel density and the file actually selected by the browser. Check sharpness, crop and size in that context. Keep a quality original and generate derivatives from it rather than repeatedly recompressing already degraded files.
07 / Discuss a context
Give every image a clear role
An inventory of visuals, rights and uses supports consistent publishing.
IIIF: distinguish the page, its image and its rights
Presentation API 3.0 organises a digitised object’s presentation. A Canvas is a virtual frame, not the image file itself. The diagram shows a typical image-painting path without assuming exactly one image per Canvas.
IIIF: distinguish the page, its image and its rights
Reference
Value or form
What it identifies
Manifest
items
Describes the compound object and organises presented views.
Canvas
items
Frame for a page or view with dimensions and associated content.
AnnotationPage
items
Collects annotations associating content with the Canvas.
Annotation
body / target
body identifies content and target its destination; painting marks content displayed on the Canvas.
rights / requiredStatement
URI / text
rights links a licence or rights statement; requiredStatement carries text to display when using the resource.
Implication for the record
For a region, retain Manifest URI, Canvas URI and the actual image used, not just a thumbnail URL. Check rights and statements at the relevant level; IIIF delivery does not grant general reuse permission.
Is a Canvas address an image to embed on a website?
Not necessarily: it identifies the presentation frame. Follow its annotation, body and any image service. Preserve that path to connect your reproduction to the original view even if technical files change.
An illustration is used in banner, map and on mobile. The publication shall take into account the framework, the readability of the subject and the information that accompanies each use.
Updated on .
Priority checks
Check original file, dimensions, variants, alternative text and legend. Test the definition of need for useful sizes and check that the links to the files correspond to the images served.
Interpretation pitfalls
A recharge may remove any essential information or change the meaning of a document. Too strong compression can make the details necessary for understanding unreadable.
Working record to retain
The publication sheet indicates role, origin, variants and user pages. It keeps the editorial choices and facilitates the consistent replacement of a visual in the corpus.
PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE
A recharge changes the reading of a document
The example is a web control educational situation. It connects the defect to a concrete path and describes a way to verify the correction, rather than consider the only publication of the change as a proof of resolution.
Example context
A visual extract shows a phrase without the note that limits its scope. The definition of the need for a card then gives a different impression of the full image.
Suggested approach
Compare all uses to the original file. Check the lost information and the available context. Keep a definition of the full need or clearly refer to the piece needed to read.
Conclusion and next step
The published version does not support an interpretation contrary to the document. The need definition choices are recorded with the user pages to facilitate a coherent correction.
Questions for deeper practice
Can one image serve all formats?
Uses may require different frameworks. Check the visible subject, the necessary details and the related information in each format before automatically reuse a variant.
DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION
Check the variants before reuse.
01 / Prepare the necessary information
Prepar original, formats, cadrages and user pages. Identify the necessary details and the information that accompanies each role of the image.
02 / Carry out the approach
Compare the variants to the full document or visual. Test the displays and check the routes of the resources. Examine the readability and context preserved in maps, banners and mobile uses.
03 / Examine an alternative situation
If a variant removes a reserve or a decisive detail, review its definition of need or role. The same image may require different adjustments depending on use.
04 / Decide on the next step
The publication is validated when the served variants correspond to the formats announced and preserve the useful meaning. The source and associated information shall remain documented.
05 / Hand over the verification records
Transmit an original inventory, variants and uses. It facilitates coordinated replacement of an image and verification of the pages that depend on its files.
ANNOTATED WORKING DOCUMENT / REVIEW GRID
A manifesto of variants and their contexts
The manifesto links original, frameworks, dimensions and user pages. It retains the editorial options that allow to replace an image without losing its role or useful information.
On a small screen, scroll the grid horizontally to read all three columns.
Example situations to assess
Observation
Supported interpretation
Next step
The served variants correspond to the planned uses.
Resources are consistent with controlled formats and frameworks.
Keep the references and test the most compulsory content.
A variation reduces the readability of a decisive detail.
The format does not preserve all the information necessary for the announced role.
Revise the compression, dimensions or destination of the visual.
The same legend is bad for a new use.
Re-use changes the reading context.
Adjust the related information and check the destination page.
Reviewing the working document
The inspector examines each role, not only the original file. A modification of the origin or definition of the need may require a review of the pages that used different variants.
REPORTING / EXAMPLE WORDING
Presentation of results: Preparing an image for its real use
Point to clarify
Variants can retain different details depending on their definition of need.
Before handing over
Control the served variants and the pages that reuse each file.
Example of a qualified conclusion
The published files have been verified for their use. The necessary details remain readable and the related information is adapted to the destination contexts.