Frame the decision
Write down the question, population, geography, period and intended use. Separate internal exploration from a public claim or individual decision.

GUIDE / PROTOCOL
A catalogue entry helps you find data; it does not establish the quality of every record or its fitness for your question.
Direct answer
Define the target population and period first. Check the producer, documentation, statistical unit, coverage, definitions, actual downloaded resource and licence. Test missing values and breaks in series. Preserve the version used and keep the conclusion within the data’s scope.
01 / Review method
Write down the question, population, geography, period and intended use. Separate internal exploration from a public claim or individual decision.
Identify the producer, primary source, unit observed, definitions, sampling if any, granularity and methodological changes. Compare stated coverage with your actual need.
Open the file or API, not just its listing. Check dates, columns, units, missing values, duplicates, geographic codes, aggregates and possible revisions. Match sample values to the documentation.
Record licence and attribution duties, identifier, URL, resource date and checksum, transformations and checks. Narrow the inference or seek another source if scope or quality is insufficient.
02 / Evidence to keep
Question, population, time and geographic coverage, statistical unit and known exclusions.
Producer, dataset ID, methodological documentation, licence and access date.
Resource name and URL, retrieval date, format, schema, checksum and version if available.
Cleaning rules, missing values, consistency test, external comparison and limits of the claim.
PRACTICAL CHECK
A frequent misreading and the check that helps avoid it.
A complete listing or high score is mistaken for validation of the observations.
Download a sample, compare units and dates to the method, and quantify missing values before drawing the conclusion.
AFTER THE REVIEW
The listing changed but the file did not. Preserve both dates and verify which resource holds the relevant observations.
Separate periods on either side of the break, record the method and avoid claiming a continuous trend without a justified adjustment.
Decision and review trail
What the check must help decide and what to retain so the choice can be reviewed.
Scope fits the question, the file was inspected, method and licence are known, and limitations can be stated clearly.
Publish a bounded claim with version and transformations; otherwise pause, supplement or change source.
OSINT / Official references
The portal points to a resource; the evidence still depends on its method and actual file.
Find French producers, licences, resources and publication dates.
Limit to rememberCheck the chosen dataset’s publisher, coverage, licence, method and last update.
Read source entryCompare European series, definitions and reference metadata.
Limit to rememberCheck method, revisions and coverage; the live database may not retain past versions.
Read source entryCheck a French series and its methods before combining figures.
Limit to rememberKeep the series code, unit, coverage, method and revisions; different scopes are not directly comparable.
Read source entry03 / FAQ
No. It covers documentation, licence and other metadata. Check the file and method separately.
No. It does not tell you which periods are covered or whether older observations were revised.
Only after comparing units, definitions, geography, periods and methods; document mappings and breaks.
Cite the exact dataset and resource, retrieval date, stable ID or URL, and transformations.
Do not assume unrestricted reuse. Check the producer’s conditions before the intended publication.
04 / Official references