Assess a public dataset before reuse

GUIDE / PROTOCOL

Assess a public dataset before reuse

A catalogue entry helps you find data; it does not establish the quality of every record or its fitness for your question.

Direct answer

When can a public dataset support a conclusion?

Define the target population and period first. Check the producer, documentation, statistical unit, coverage, definitions, actual downloaded resource and licence. Test missing values and breaks in series. Preserve the version used and keep the conclusion within the data’s scope.

01 / Review method

Review method

01

Frame the decision

Write down the question, population, geography, period and intended use. Separate internal exploration from a public claim or individual decision.

02

Read the method

Identify the producer, primary source, unit observed, definitions, sampling if any, granularity and methodological changes. Compare stated coverage with your actual need.

03

Inspect the resource

Open the file or API, not just its listing. Check dates, columns, units, missing values, duplicates, geographic codes, aggregates and possible revisions. Match sample values to the documentation.

04

Decide and record

Record licence and attribution duties, identifier, URL, resource date and checksum, transformations and checks. Narrow the inference or seek another source if scope or quality is insufficient.

02 / Evidence to keep

Evidence to keep

Scope

Question, population, time and geographic coverage, statistical unit and known exclusions.

Provenance

Producer, dataset ID, methodological documentation, licence and access date.

Processed version

Resource name and URL, retrieval date, format, schema, checksum and version if available.

Repeatable check

Cleaning rules, missing values, consistency test, external comparison and limits of the claim.

PRACTICAL CHECK

Before reaching a conclusion

A frequent misreading and the check that helps avoid it.

Premature conclusion

A complete listing or high score is mistaken for validation of the observations.

Decisive check

Download a sample, compare units and dates to the method, and quantify missing values before drawing the conclusion.

AFTER THE REVIEW

Decide from the evidence

01

Two dates differ

The listing changed but the file did not. Preserve both dates and verify which resource holds the relevant observations.

02

A definition changes

Separate periods on either side of the break, record the method and avoid claiming a continuous trend without a justified adjustment.

Decision and review trail

Decision and review trail

What the check must help decide and what to retain so the choice can be reviewed.

Sufficient evidence

Scope fits the question, the file was inspected, method and licence are known, and limitations can be stated clearly.

Next decision

Publish a bounded claim with version and transformations; otherwise pause, supplement or change source.

OSINT / Official references

Choose the catalogue for the question

The portal points to a resource; the evidence still depends on its method and actual file.

FR

data.gouv.fr

Why start here

Find French producers, licences, resources and publication dates.

Limit to remember

Check the chosen dataset’s publisher, coverage, licence, method and last update.

Read source entry
EU

Eurostat · Data Browser

Why start here

Compare European series, definitions and reference metadata.

Limit to remember

Check method, revisions and coverage; the live database may not retain past versions.

Read source entry
FR

Insee · Séries chronologiques

Why start here

Check a French series and its methods before combining figures.

Limit to remember

Keep the series code, unit, coverage, method and revisions; different scopes are not directly comparable.

Read source entry
See all 52 public sources

03 / FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Does a catalogue quality score validate the figures?

No. It covers documentation, licence and other metadata. Check the file and method separately.

Is a recent update date enough?

No. It does not tell you which periods are covered or whether older observations were revised.

Can two producers’ series be combined?

Only after comparing units, definitions, geography, periods and methods; document mappings and breaks.

Which version should be cited?

Cite the exact dataset and resource, retrieval date, stable ID or URL, and transformations.

What if the licence is missing?

Do not assume unrestricted reuse. Check the producer’s conditions before the intended publication.

Describe a context