Search

Search the site’s resources

A single starting point to find the method, source or situation relevant to your question.

Find a method for your task

All words must match, regardless of case or accents. Search stays in the selected language.

From two characters: use arrows to choose, Enter to open, Escape to close. You can also submit the full search.

147 results

Clear filters
  1. Dossier

    Editorial architecture & topical authority

    Guide to editorial architecture, internal linking, expert content and topical authority by Alexis Roux ZG.

  2. Dossier

    Evidence doctrine & digital provenance

    Evidence doctrine, source qualification, confidence levels and explicit correction by Alexis Roux ZG.

  3. Dossier

    Digital intervention scenarios

    Audit, OSINT, reputation, AI visibility and mission-direction scenarios by Alexis Roux ZG.

  4. Protocol

    Crawling and indexing audit

    A practical protocol to diagnose URLs, status codes, canonicals, languages, rendering and images before publishing more content.

  5. Protocol

    Evidence and source register

    An editorial traceability method linking important claims to a source, date and confidence level.

  6. Protocol

    Control AI crawler access

    Separate search crawling, indexing and training collection, then test robots rules and actual HTTP responses.

  7. Protocol

    Build a verifiable entity profile

    Align names, roles, sources, public profiles and structured data to identify a person or organisation without visibility promises.

  8. Protocol

    Map AI system dependencies

    A protocol to inventory models, data, tools, vendors, costs and exit options before a dependency becomes critical.

  9. Protocol

    Evaluate an AI agent before release

    A test protocol for accuracy, refusal, permissions, tool failures and human recovery before an AI agent is allowed to act.

  10. Protocol

    Maintain a reliable editorial corpus

    A maintenance protocol for reviewing sources, dates, links, translations and outdated pages without publishing redundant material.

  11. Protocol

    Qualify an open source before using it

    An OSINT method to distinguish origin, publisher, repetition, interest, independence and limits of a public source.

  12. Protocol

    Map actors using public sources

    An OSINT protocol for organisations, domains, roles and visible relationships without mistaking namesakes for proven links.

  13. Protocol

    Verify the context of a public image

    A method to inspect origin, earliest known occurrence, place, date, edits and limits of an image circulating online.

  14. Dossier

    Public sources for verifiable OSINT research

    76 documented registers, archives and open-data services: what to check, their limits and how to corroborate open-source findings.

  15. Protocol

    Read and cite a public decision

    A method to find a decision, identify its type, cite exact passages and test the scope of a public claim.

  16. Dossier

    Compare search engines and AI assistants

    A method for comparing search engines and AI assistants through sources, freshness, language, accuracy, journeys and data context.

  17. Guide

    Trace the evidence behind a claim

    A method for connecting a claim to primary records, versions, transformations and limits before publication or decision.

  18. Guide

    Publish a coherent multilingual site

    A multilingual publishing method covering factual parity, navigation, hreflang, HTML language, images, forms and post-update checks.

  19. Guide

    Publish useful, accessible editorial images

    A method for selecting, describing, optimizing and publishing editorial images with context, rights and variants.

  20. Guide

    Publish structured data that matches the page

    A method for describing pages, entities and articles in JSON-LD without exceeding visible facts or promising rich results.

  21. Guide

    Build internal links that help readers

    A method for connecting pillar pages, guides, protocols and sources with understandable, testable links.

  22. Tool

    Review templates and registers

    48 worksheets with fields, filled fictional examples and review rules connecting observations, limits and next actions.

  23. Guide

    Verify a research reference and its version

    DOI, ORCID, ROR, HAL, PubMed and open repositories: find full text, distinguish versions and authors, check updates, data and the scope of a reference.

  24. Tool

    Compose a public-source reference

    Open the exact resource and record its title, producer, date, version, identifier and useful passage. The guidance below helps prepare a traceable reference.

Choose a starting point

Check a source

Examine the origin, date, scope and limits of information.

How can I refine the search?
Start with the topic
Enter one or two specific terms: citation, CSV or provenance. Every word must be present, so a long sentence can exclude useful pages.
Broaden before filtering
Search all families first. Then select a guide, protocol or source according to the kind of answer you need.
Try different wording
Try a synonym or a term in the selected language. Quotes, OR and asterisks are not search operators.

DEEPER READING / PRACTICE

Turn internal search into a useful user journey

A query produces several close results. Reading should help to distinguish the need definition folder, detailed method and implementation tool.

Updated on .

Priority checks

Formulate a specific need and then try neighboring terms. Read the descriptions and select the type of resource according to the searched step: understand, run or control.

Interpretation pitfalls

The first result is not always the best document to the context. An absence can come from the vocabulary used rather than a lack of content.

Working record to retain

A short route connects a need definition page, a guide and a checklist. Maintaining unresolved questions helps to rebuild research.

PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE

A natural requirement does not match the exact title

The following case illustrates an approach to defining the need. Situations are pedagogical: they serve to examine the choices and conditions of success, without describing a fulfilled mission or announcing a guaranteed result.

Example context

A reader is looking for how to check a number, while the resources use the word indicator. The results must allow to continue despite a different formulation of the title.

Suggested approach

Try the neighboring terms and read the descriptions. Differentiate methods of calculation, comparison and verification of sources. Choose the resource that corresponds to the actually sought-by-step.

Conclusion and next step

Research becomes a path of solution. The questions still open serve to clarify the next query instead of multiplying the words without clear intention.

Questions for deeper practice

How do you improve a search without losing the initial need?

Keep the starting question and then specify the object, operation and resource type. Useful results give a complementary vocabulary, but their title should not automatically replace the reader's target.

DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION

Refine a query for the task to carry out

  1. 01 / Prepare the necessary information

    Describe the initial question and the desired result. Identify the object, operation and type of resource that could help: file, method or tool.

  2. 02 / Carry out the approach

    Try a formulation and read the descriptions. Release the useful terms and test the variants without giving up the intention. Compare the resources found according to their contribution to the route.

  3. 03 / Examine an alternative situation

    If the results are close but too general, specify the operation or scope. A well-classed page is not necessarily the one that meets the searched step.

  4. 04 / Decide on the next step

    Research is useful when it leads to a resource whose response can be identified. Open questions are used to prepare for the next consultation.

  5. 05 / Hand over the verification records

    Keep a short track with request, resource and supplement. The reader can restart his work without repaired the tests that have led to useful content.

ANNOTATED WORKING DOCUMENT / REVIEW GRID

A track record from a request

The note retains question, tried formulations, useful results and next resource. It distinguishes the exploration vocabulary from the initial goal of the reader.

On a small screen, scroll the grid horizontally to read all three columns.

Example situations to assess
ObservationSupported interpretationNext step
A resource responds to the desired operation.The result can serve as a useful step in the course.Keep the passage and choose the necessary supplement.
The results remain general despite the good topic.The request must specify action, object or scope.Try an appropriate formulation without losing the initial question.
The first result has the word but not the answer.The presence of the term does not prove its relevance.Read the descriptions and compare the contribution of resources.

Reviewing the working document

The final verification verifies that each step reduces an open question. A link list is not yet a useful path if the reader cannot explain what each page brings.

REPORTING / EXAMPLE WORDING

Presentation of results: Turn internal search into a useful user journey

Point to clarify

A search result must be judged according to its contribution to the searched operation.

Before handing over

Check that the track keeps the initial question despite the vocabulary variants.

Example of a qualified conclusion

The resource selected meets the described stage of the need. The questions still open guidelines the next consultation and remain distinct from the answer found.