Choose a method
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Search
A single starting point to find the method, source or situation relevant to your question.
Find a method for your taskAll words must match, regardless of case or accents. Search stays in the selected language.
From two characters: use arrows to choose, Enter to open, Escape to close. You can also submit the full search.
Strategic monitoring, weak signals, ecosystem surveillance and decision alerts by Alexis Roux ZG.
Independent direction of complex digital assignments, arbitration, coordination and quality control by Alexis Roux ZG.
Strategic guide to SEO, SXO, GEO, AEO and visibility in AI answers by Alexis Roux ZG.
Guide to LLMO, AI citations, generative visibility measurement and answer reliability by Alexis Roux ZG.
Measurement protocol for SEO, GEO, LLMO, AI citations and entity accuracy by Alexis Roux ZG.
Audit, OSINT, reputation, AI visibility and mission-direction scenarios by Alexis Roux ZG.
An editorial traceability method linking important claims to a source, date and confidence level.
A repeatable protocol for tracking generative answers, cited sources, errors and differences between interfaces.
A protocol to inventory models, data, tools, vendors, costs and exit options before a dependency becomes critical.
A maintenance protocol for reviewing sources, dates, links, translations and outdated pages without publishing redundant material.
An OSINT method to distinguish origin, publisher, repetition, interest, independence and limits of a public source.
An OSINT protocol for organisations, domains, roles and visible relationships without mistaking namesakes for proven links.
A method to inspect origin, earliest known occurrence, place, date, edits and limits of an image circulating online.
76 documented registers, archives and open-data services: what to check, their limits and how to corroborate open-source findings.
A protocol for checking coverage, method, version, licence and limitations before analysing or publishing public data.
A method for comparing search engines and AI assistants through sources, freshness, language, accuracy, journeys and data context.
A method for connecting a claim to primary records, versions, transformations and limits before publication or decision.
A method for selecting, describing, optimizing and publishing editorial images with context, rights and variants.
48 worksheets with fields, filled fictional examples and review rules connecting observations, limits and next actions.
SIREN, SIRET, Sirene, RNE and BODACC: choose sources, distinguish legal units from establishments, compare dates and document a company.
DOI, ORCID, ROR, HAL, PubMed and open repositories: find full text, distinguish versions and authors, check updates, data and the scope of a reference.
Open the exact resource and record its title, producer, date, version, identifier and useful passage. The guidance below helps prepare a traceable reference.
20 review plans, 60 criteria and worked decisions for assessing evidence, discrepancies, unknowns and next steps in web, AI or OSINT checks.
Identify a web capture, retain original and archived URLs, separate dates and examine version changes without inventing continuity.
Start from a task: verify, compare, document or decide.
Examine the origin, date, scope and limits of information.
Find definitions before applying a protocol.
DEEPER READING / PRACTICE
A query produces several close results. Reading should help to distinguish the need definition folder, detailed method and implementation tool.
Updated on .
Formulate a specific need and then try neighboring terms. Read the descriptions and select the type of resource according to the searched step: understand, run or control.
The first result is not always the best document to the context. An absence can come from the vocabulary used rather than a lack of content.
A short route connects a need definition page, a guide and a checklist. Maintaining unresolved questions helps to rebuild research.
PRACTICAL CASE / WORKED EXAMPLE
The following case illustrates an approach to defining the need. Situations are pedagogical: they serve to examine the choices and conditions of success, without describing a fulfilled mission or announcing a guaranteed result.
A reader is looking for how to check a number, while the resources use the word indicator. The results must allow to continue despite a different formulation of the title.
Try the neighboring terms and read the descriptions. Differentiate methods of calculation, comparison and verification of sources. Choose the resource that corresponds to the actually sought-by-step.
Research becomes a path of solution. The questions still open serve to clarify the next query instead of multiplying the words without clear intention.
Keep the starting question and then specify the object, operation and resource type. Useful results give a complementary vocabulary, but their title should not automatically replace the reader's target.
DETAILED WORKSHOP / APPLICATION
Describe the initial question and the desired result. Identify the object, operation and type of resource that could help: file, method or tool.
Try a formulation and read the descriptions. Release the useful terms and test the variants without giving up the intention. Compare the resources found according to their contribution to the route.
If the results are close but too general, specify the operation or scope. A well-classed page is not necessarily the one that meets the searched step.
Research is useful when it leads to a resource whose response can be identified. Open questions are used to prepare for the next consultation.
Keep a short track with request, resource and supplement. The reader can restart his work without repaired the tests that have led to useful content.
ANNOTATED WORKING DOCUMENT / REVIEW GRID
The note retains question, tried formulations, useful results and next resource. It distinguishes the exploration vocabulary from the initial goal of the reader.
On a small screen, scroll the grid horizontally to read all three columns.
| Observation | Supported interpretation | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| A resource responds to the desired operation. | The result can serve as a useful step in the course. | Keep the passage and choose the necessary supplement. |
| The results remain general despite the good topic. | The request must specify action, object or scope. | Try an appropriate formulation without losing the initial question. |
| The first result has the word but not the answer. | The presence of the term does not prove its relevance. | Read the descriptions and compare the contribution of resources. |
The final verification verifies that each step reduces an open question. A link list is not yet a useful path if the reader cannot explain what each page brings.
REPORTING / EXAMPLE WORDING
A search result must be judged according to its contribution to the searched operation.
Check that the track keeps the initial question despite the vocabulary variants.
The resource selected meets the described stage of the need. The questions still open guidelines the next consultation and remain distinct from the answer found.